top of page

TYLER ROBINSON KILLER OF CHARLIE KIRK OR VICTIM OF HORMONAL DRUGS?

  • Writer: Michael Thervil
    Michael Thervil
  • Sep 14
  • 2 min read

Written by Michael Thervil

 

CHARLIE KIRK (RIGHT) TYLER ROBINSON (LEFT) ANDREW HARNIK/GETTY; UTAH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
CHARLIE KIRK (RIGHT) TYLER ROBINSON (LEFT) ANDREW HARNIK/GETTY; UTAH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE

[Charlie Kirk Tyler Robinson] Tyler Robinson (22), the alleged lone sniper who law enforcement officials are suspected of killing 31-year-old right wing Commentator, Activist, and co-Founder of the organization called "Turning Point” Charlie Kirk during his “American Comeback” speaking tour on Wednesday at Utah Valley University located in Orem Utah, will be formally charged during the early days of next week. Tyler Robinson who was arrested on Thursday night is now being suspected by many to have been under the influence of hormonal drugs. Charlie Kirk was shot and killed due to one shot striking him in the neck as he spoke against what he describes as the goals of the LGBTQ Agenda and his perceived dangers of sex changing drugs.

 

Currently law enforcement officials have no motive in what some are calling a “mountain of evidence” against Tyler Robinson who was turned over to police by his father “Matt” who spoke to a minister who had connections with local police. It was reported to Press that Tyler Robinson stated to his father that he would rather commit suicide that turn himself in. Tyler Robinson was also a former student at Utah Valley University in 2021 who earned a $32,000 presidential scholarship as a pre-engineering major but later dropped out and at some point, began attending Dixie Technical College and enrolled in their electrical apprenticeship program which is in St. George Utah.

 

OUR POSITION AT VEDA WORLD NEWS

Gun violence in America is the norm, with thousands of people either being shot and/or killed every year by guns and gun violence, the only question is what makes Charlie Kirk stand out as a poster child in today's and times. The real question that should be addressed is why are Americans allowing people in power to not only censor them but take action against and adversely affect the livelihoods of people who may have a different perspective than them when it comes to Charlie Kirk and other things? There have been teachers and other workers across industries that have been either disciplined and/or fired from their jobs all over the country.

 

There has been a sizable amount of the American population that hold the position that Charlie Kirk has never done anything to anyone. In contrast, there is also a sizable number of people that adhere to the perspective that Charlie Kirk, in all his conservative righteousness, failed to keep in mind the type of political environment and mentally unstable climate that Americans are living in today. So is he directly responsible for his own demise no, however, it can easily be argued that he literally placed himself in the crosshairs of a mentally unstable shooter.

 

It should also be said and understood that whether he knowingly or unknowingly placed himself in harm's way, the one thing that should be fought for and celebrated is the fact that American citizens have the right to fully exercise their 1st Amendment right to “Free Speech”. But in fighting for and exercising that right – only the most socially mature American understand that nothing in life is free (except for Jesus) and that includes speech.

Comments


bottom of page