Written by Michael Thervil
AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall
There has been a lot of talk about Project 2025 which can be likened as a 900 plus page manual on how the nation should go forward on implementing conservative values for the betterment of the United States. But the issue is that many Americans either don’t know what it is, are too lazy to read any parts of the manuscript or are relying on other people to tell them what was in it without verifying the information that is being told to them by others. In doing so, many Americans appear to be giving into baseless conspiracy theories that either inhibit or distort the ideas and topics that are contained within the Project 2025 manuscript.
For some people the Project 2025 manuscript is a godsend because for them they appreciate the conservative tone and its promotion of moral values that many people both in and outside of America wish they could return to. However, the people that wish to subscribe to the conservative and return to moral values that Project 2025 speaks about are overshadowed by people who disagree with it and or simply don’t even know what it’s about. Sensitive and controversial topics such as the elimination of the Department of Education, the elimination of HeadStart, the elimination of pornography, the banning of abortion, upholding states’ rights, and the dismantling of the FBI are on the forefront of the minds of people that are against it.
However, when people look at these hot button topics closely, they tend to change their position on any negative thoughts and ideas that they may have previously had about Project 2025. The truth is the Department of Education has failed America. It, like the vast majority of governmental departments and programs, has not only been found ineffective but extremely wasteful when it comes to managing and the allocation of its funds and resources. Moreover, when it comes to HeadStart, it seems like many children get left behind by the time they finish a HeadStart program.
When it comes to the Heritage Foundation’s recommendation on the elimination of pornography, it can be argued that even though we will always have pornography, pornography plays a detrimental role in both the exploitation and objectification of women. Additionally, it can be argued that pornography has not only increased the number of women being trafficked for sex, but it Projects unrealistic intimate and sexual expectations between women and men.
Another hot button topic is the banning of sex changes. Although people within the LGBTQ community, specifically Transexuals, take issue with the Heritage Foundation’s measures against Transsexuals on any level. The contrasting viewpoint can be argued that the promotion of what’s known as the “Gay Agenda” and Transsexualism further corrupts the moral fabric of America. In fact, it can and has been argued that the promotion of the LGBTQ community undermines the U.S. military’s combat readiness. Thus, adversely affecting U.S. national security even though the number of adults who subscribe to the LGBTQ population makes up less than 7% of the population. Countering that argument, proponents of Project 2025 states that even though less than 7% subscribes to the LGTBQ community, normalizing the LGBTQ thus legitimizing this community will only groom future generations children to be a part of it. Hence, increasing that 7%.
On the topic of abortion, proponents of Project 2025 propose a complete ban on it. While many people against the implementation of Project 2025 feel as if it infringes on the reproductive rights of women and gives license for men to rape women, it appears that their argument falls apart when you look at the statistics which we highlighted in a previous article entitled: “Abortions Are For Whores Who Hate Responsibility & Accountability”, we informed the public of the following:
“According to the National Institute of Medicine the consist of the following: Women’s reasons for seeking an abortion fell into 11 broad themes. The predominant themes identified as reasons for seeking abortion included financial reasons (40%), timing (36%), partner related reasons (31%), and the need to focus on other children (29%). Most women reported multiple reasons for seeking an abortion crossing over several themes (64%). Using mixed effects multivariate logistic regression analyses, we identified the social and demographic predictors of the predominant theme’s women gave for seeking an abortion. But of the number of cases in which rape and incest which resulted in a woman having an abortion only registered out to be 0.3%”
So, women being raped is a non-factor. For many women it seems as if they don’t want to bear the brunt of responsibility when it comes to having unprotected sex with various men. Then there is the FBI, who often weaponize the law to the extent that it becomes tyrannical for people within the United States. This unsettling reality becomes even more true when it comes to the FBI exercising their legal upper hand with Black American Men.
In all, if you believe in maintaining social morality and value conservative values then Project 2025 is for you. But if you believe in misguided chaos, then Project 2025 is something that should scare you. For your edification we have provided a pdf copy of Project 2025 here for you to download so you can see what it’s about for yourself. https://www.project2025.org/policy/
Comments