top of page

DEPARTMENT OF WAR’S $1.5 TRILLION 2027 BUDGET REQUEST

  • Writer: Michael Thervil
    Michael Thervil
  • 1 day ago
  • 3 min read

Written by Michael thervil

 

DEPARTMENT OF WAR’S $1.5 TRILLION 2027 BUDGET REQUEST | VIDEO COURTESY OF THE PENTAGON

[Department of War $1.5 trillion 2027 budget] As West Asia and the domestic politics in the United States continue to burn at an unprecedented rate, America's Department of War formally known as the Department of Defense recently put in a $1.5 trillion budget request for 2027. This request comes at a time when most Americans are struggling to keep up with rent and mortgage payments, rising job insecurity, declining educational standards, and with oil and gas prices in combination with core inflation have been increasing. The 2027 budget request is a 42% increase from this year's current budget and includes the rebuilding of what American military officials are calling the “Arsenal of Freedom” which entails the expansion of American technical dominance, enhanced military readiness, and industrial base expansion.

 

It was reported that half (52%) of the $1.5 trillion will be used to obtain new planes, weapons, ammunition, and ships. Despite this, detractors believe that the Department of War’s budget increase request will not serve in the best interest of the public and will instead line the pockets of various military defense contractors, defense companies such as Boeing, Northrop Grumman, RTX (formally Raytheon), General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin and others. Also included in those speculated to financially gain from the possible passing of 2027 $1.5 trillion are the politicians that have stakes and shares in these defense contractors and companies.

 

Some of the figures that were shared was $17.5 trillion to construct an American version of Israel's iron dome renamed for American defense as the “Golden Dome”. Then there was a section of $74 billion for advanced drone and counter drone technology. Another $113 billion for the upgrading of America's defense industrial base which entails ammunition production and upgrading America's defense supply chain. Another $65.8 billion was said to be partitioned for the American maritime “Golden Fleet” initiative which includes the construction of 18 new battle ships and 116 support vessels. $75 billion is also said to be cut out for America's Space Force for space dominance. This funding would include the execution of 31 space launches and the advancement of American missile tracking capabilities.

 

Amongst other things, there was a $71.4 billion set aside for the modernization of America's nuclear capabilities and classes (Columbia Class, Sentinel, and B-21). If the budget proposal for 2027 was to be approved, it would also include a 5%-7% raise for all military Servicemen with a concentration for Enlisted Servicemen E-5 and below. It is speculated that the reason why E-5 and below were targeted for a pay increase was so that the military could attract more recruits. To justify the increase for higher pay for military Servicemen was because they predicted that they would need a minimum of 44,000 additional recruits, a growth rate of 2%. There was also a requested increase of $57 billion for the upgrading of military barracks and family housing for American Servicemen.

 

OUR POSITION AT VEDA WORLD NEWS

While the request for $1.5 trillion for next year's budgets sounds like a good idea, especially for the wallets of American military personnel, this budget increase does not change the international perception of America on the global stage. Where America pursues military dominance, the international community appears to be pursuing peace and the continued development of free trade and positive diplomatic relations and strategic partnerships in a multipolar world. In other words, “Fight and Might” doesn’t equate to “Peace and Stability” as fight and might has only historically led to both animosity and increased hostilities on the global stage.

 

Another question that should be asked is why military planners and officials are seeking $1.5 trillion in the first place considering that the previous year's budget appeared to be more of a national monetary risk than an asset. What we mean by this is that the military budget for 2026 dug America deeper into a financial deficit than ever before, the budget for 2027 only appears to compound that fact with no justifiable returns on investment.

Comments


bottom of page