U.S. MILITARY IMPLEMENTS 90 DAY "FORTRESS INITIATIVE" IN LIEU OF ANTICIPATED IRAN’S RETALIATION STRIKES
Written by Michael Thervil
[U.S. MILITARY 90 DAY FORTRESS INITIATIVE IRAN] The U.S. Department of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has recently ordered that all American Military Bases must be ready to operate independently for an estimated 90 days under the FORTRESS Initiative. The FORTRESS Initiative which stands for Federal Operations for Resilience, Troop Resources, Energy, Supply, and Survivability comes at a time where the Trump Administration appears to be preparing itself to execute another round of military strikes against Iran after the midterm elections. In response the IRGC (Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps) have issued a stern warning to the Trump Administration stating that any military aggression towards Iran by America or Israel will trigger them to engage in retaliatory military action “without geographical limitations”.
Iranian Ayatollah and Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei has also ordered his Senior Military Commanders to update their target lists. The American Military’s FORTRESS Initiative is centered around resource stockpiling, communications and space resilience and dominance, energy independence, and logistical supply chain and industrial hardening. In preparation for what many geopolitical and war analysts are calling a “highly anticipated military actions” by the American and Israeli’s; America has conducted an assessment of roughly 500 of its Military Bases which by conservative measure may take years to successfully complete.
Meanwhile Iran appears to have taken a hyper-proactive approach in that they have engaged in the hyper-production of updated and highly advanced missiles and ICBM (Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles) to the point that they have essentially “ran out of missile storage space”. While the reason U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth ordered the FORTRESS Initiative provided to the Press is centered around the Trump Administration wanting American Bases and Military Assets to be hardened against being “cut off, starved off, and or shut down during a major war or crisis”. Detractors of that position have been pushing another narrative which is centered upon the American Military feeling the need to strategically prepare themselves to execute a series of kinetic military action against Iran that could prove to be an existential crisis and embarrassment for the American Military on the world stage.
We will keep you updated as this mandate for the American Military continues to evolve.
Comments